{"id":3072,"date":"2020-09-30T12:56:32","date_gmt":"2020-09-30T16:56:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/oldleandude.com\/?p=3072"},"modified":"2020-09-30T12:56:32","modified_gmt":"2020-09-30T16:56:32","slug":"superficial-improvement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oldleandude.com\/2020\/09\/30\/superficial-improvement\/","title":{"rendered":"Superficial Improvement"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Several years ago, I wrote a post (worth a quick re-read<\/a>) entitled, \u201cRosie the Robot,\u201d wondering how technology changes that have emerged in this century will affect continuous improvement efforts. \u00a0\u00a0Now, with just a week to go before our 16th<\/sup> Annual Northeast L.E.A.N. Lean Conference<\/a>, I\u2019ll add this\u00a0thought regarding my 8th<\/sup> Lean Peeve<\/strong>, \u00a0what Shigeo Shingo called superficial improvement<\/strong>, transferring a manual waste to a machine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Having spent thirty years in manufacturing in the last<\/em> century before becoming a consultant, I had a chance to be up close and personal with these kinds of superficial improvement:<\/p>\n\n\n\n These examples actually MULTIPLIED waste rather than reducing it — in the name of local efficiency<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Superficial improvement is supported not only by conventional cost accounting<\/a> but also by this simplistic equation:\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mechanization = Process Improvement<\/p>\n\n\n\n I wonder sometimes if this equation is taught in Engineering 101, because it\u2019s a staple for many a machine justification. <\/p>\n\n\n\n